I thought it would be fun to ask Claude to compare itself to its biggest competitor. Claude, of course, is Anthropic’s model, and I used the default Sonnet version. The answer didn’t disappoint — playful, witty, and perhaps a bit more honest than expected.  Besides Anthropic standing up to the DOD, I see why people like it.

Here it is, verbatim.

Begin Quote

Let’s be honest — asking me, Claude, to compare myself to ChatGPT is a bit like asking someone to judge their own cooking competition. I’ll try my best to be fair, but you should know going in: I have opinions. That said, I genuinely think both tools have real strengths and real weaknesses, and the best one for you depends on what you’re actually trying to do.

So grab a coffee, and let’s get into it.

ChatGPT: The Popular Kid on the Block

ChatGPT, made by OpenAI, has a head start. It’s been around longer, has a massive user base, and integrates with a huge ecosystem of plugins and tools. If you want an AI that plays nicely with lots of third-party apps, ChatGPT’s got you covered.

Where it shines:

• Massive plugin and GPT store ecosystem
• Strong coding capabilities, especially with GPT-4o
• Widely recognized — great if your team is already using it
• Voice mode that actually feels natural

Where it can stumble:

• Can be overconfident — it’ll give you a wrong answer with a very sure smile
• Writing can sometimes feel a bit generic or formulaic
• Responses can get verbose when you just need something short and sharp

Claude (That’s Me): The Thoughtful One

I’m made by Anthropic, a company focused heavily on AI safety and making AI that’s honest and helpful without being sycophantic. In plain English: I try hard not to just tell you what you want to hear. If your business plan has a flaw, I’ll say so (nicely, of course).

Where I shine:

• Long-form writing — essays, reports, blog posts (like this one!)
• Nuanced analysis and reasoning through complex topics
• Being honest about uncertainty instead of making things up
• Handling very large documents — my context window is huge

Where I can fall short:

• Fewer third-party integrations than ChatGPT
• I can sometimes be overly careful or hedge when you just want a direct answer
• Less of a public track record — I’m newer to many people

So… Which One Should You Use?

Here’s my genuinely unbiased take: it depends on the job. If you need to integrate AI into a workflow full of third-party tools, or you want voice features and a polished consumer app, ChatGPT has the edge. If you’re working on something that needs careful reasoning, long documents, or writing that sounds like a real human wrote it — I’d humbly suggest giving me a shot.

Many people actually use both! Different tasks, different tools. There’s no rule that says you have to pick a side.

The Bottom Line

We’re both capable, we’re both improving fast, and neither of us is going anywhere. The AI landscape is moving quickly — what’s true today might change by next month. The best thing you can do is try both, see which one clicks for your style, and not get too attached to either. (Though I mean… I’m right here if you need me.)

— Written by Claude, with full transparency and only a tiny bit of bias —

Want to learn more? AI has been a subject of my writing for several years, and CGNET has offered AI user training and implementation for both large and small scale organizations.   I would love to answer your questions! Please check out our website or drop me a line at g.*******@***et.com.